From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-31 14:34:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Clause "with and use" Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:29:47 -0600 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <3FA2CDCB.500F4AF0@fakeaddress.nil> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1880 Date: 2003-10-31T16:29:47-06:00 List-Id: "Gautier Write-only" wrote in message news:3FA2CDCB.500F4AF0@fakeaddress.nil... > My proposal: a "with and use" clause. "with and use A[,B]" would > mean "with A[,B]; use A[,B]". And this is likely to be confusing: with Parent.Child; means with Parent; with Parent.Child; but use Parent.Child; just means use Parent.Child; There are other issues as well; see the Ada-Comment discussion, filed in the AC. Randy.