From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,25aa3c7e1b59f7b5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-14 08:09:42 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.251.151.101!opentransit.net!proxad.net!proxad.net!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!ciril.fr!news.ujf-grenoble.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!news.ens-lyon.fr!news.imag.fr!not-for-mail
From: Matthieu Moy <MatthieumNOSPAM@yahoo.com.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: A case where Ada defaults to unsafe?
Date: 14 Jan 2002 17:09:33 +0100
Organization: Verimag
Message-ID: <vpqadvgud6q.fsf@ubaye.imag.fr>
References: <3C34BF2C.6030500@mail.com> <a12il6$gcs$1@bob.news.rcn.net>
 <3C34D252.4070307@mail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ubaye.imag.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: trompette.imag.fr 1011024573 7130 129.88.43.88 (14 Jan 2002 16:09:33
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@imag.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jan 2002 16:09:33 GMT
X-Home-Page: http://www-ensimag.imag.fr/eleves/Matthieu.Moy/
X-Face: 
 %xEb27l:C~bcH,tGGRk8m'o_}XBMb*NoIbS$sp(:3s+l@PwMH+C*7Vf@Y_]%rP)<xQ)`!Niu#OP]=|LPx:6"B,Mby;7`w!dfIc[""GxHiWTCkF+iEEh2Mti6NY|a$'tI06#f%Xfv#OB.4#:74QU)*3Q_:;%Qo<E3>*/'`Lpt[O9C;jbVo?Qp
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18910
Date: 2002-01-14T16:09:33+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:

> Frank J. Lhota wrote:
> 
> > The situation is quite similar in C/C++; if you use the siumpler & and |
> > operators, they do not short-circuit. In either C/C++ or Ada, experienced
> > programmers know what needs to be done in order to get short-circuiting.
> 
> 
> In C/C++ "everyone" knows that & and | are for bit twiddling and && and ||
> are for combining logical expressions.

But in Java, which is supposed to look like C++, | and & are what
Frank said they were. That may be the origin of the mistake.

-- 
| Matthieu MOY