From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	LOTS_OF_MONEY,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,e01bd86884246855
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fb1663c3ca80b502
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Veli-Pekka Nousiainen" <vp.nousiainen@lapinlahden-teknologiakeskus.fi>
Subject: Re: Interresting thread in comp.lang.eiffel
Date: 2000/07/18
Message-ID: <vnZc5.209$2y3.8676@read2.inet.fi>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 647775811
References: <8ipvnj$inc$1@wanadoo.fr> <8j67p8$afd$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <slrn8leffq.ebq.gisle@spurv.ii.uib.no>
  <395886DA.CCE008D2@deepthought.com.au> <3958B07B.18A5BB8C@acm.com>
  <y1d65.620$7%3.33446@news.flash.net> <395A0ECA.940560D1@acm.com>
  <8jd4bb$na7$1@toralf.uib.no> <8jfabb$1d8$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <8jhq0m$30u5$1@toralf.uib.no> <8jt4j7$19hpk$1@ID-9852.news.cis.dfn.de>
 <3963CDDE.3E8FB644@earthlink.net> <3963DEBF.79C40BF1@eiffel.com>
 <2LS85.6100$7%3.493920@news.flash.net>
 <8k5aru$1odtq$1@ID-9852.news.cis.dfn.de>
 <Rnt95.7826$7%3.596208@news.flash.net>
 <8k8pk2$20cab$1@ID-9852.news.cis.dfn.de>
 <_dS95.9945$7%3.666180@news.flash.net> <qe_a5.259$6E.64803@ptah.visi.com>
 <yq7b5.13179$7%3.915706@news.flash.net> <BRab5.418$6E.94216@ptah.visi.com>
 <vLub5.16107$7%3.987416@news.flash.net>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4029.2901
X-Trace: read2.inet.fi 963928667 213.28.8.37 (Tue,
 18 Jul 2000 16:57:47 EET DST)
Organization: Sonera corp Internet services
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Reply-To: "Veli-Pekka Nousiainen"
 <oista_vp.nousiainen@lapinlahden-teknologiakeskus.fi>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 16:57:47 EET DST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel
Date: 2000-07-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hi, Ken !

"Ken Garlington" <Ken.Garlington@computer.org> wrote in message
news:vLub5.16107$7%3.987416@news.flash.net...
> As I note in the paper, you can reasonably generate examples where DbC
> helps. However, the examples provided to date are not, IMHO, germaine to
the
> specifics of the Ariane 5 case. Here's an even more interesting aspect:
X
Does this mean that you otherwise consider DbC a superior
methodology - exept that IYHO in this particular case even DbC
would have been: Not Enough !
?
Asks Veli-Pekka