From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f727b37cf2b2e501
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-01 13:05:21 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: No_Abort_Statements
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:07:04 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <vili00nke57a8d@corp.supernews.com>
References: <bgbrbg$3ds$1@news.cs.tu-berlin.de>
 <vij0eehf4ogs50@corp.supernews.com> <87smom4aiq.fsf@inf.enst.fr>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41133
Date: 2003-08-01T15:07:04-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Samuel Tardieu" <sam@rfc1149.net> wrote in message
news:87smom4aiq.fsf@inf.enst.fr...
> >>>>> "Randy" == Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:
>
> Randy> It seems like there should be a way to eliminate ATC as
> Randy> well.
>
> There is: pragma Restrictions (Max_Asynchronous_Select_Nesting = 0);

You're right, I missed that. (I forgot that no nesting means no ATC).

So the answer to the original question is to use both
    pragma Restrictions (No_Abort_Statements);
and
    pragma Restrictions (Max_Asychronous_Select_Nesting => 0);

(And still sent a bug report to ACT.)

                 Randy.