From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,94f58dd2d6c2d73d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-02 05:13:59 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!wizard.pn.com!satisfied.elf.com!news.mathworks.com!udel!gatech!swrinde!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!newshub.nosc.mil!avalon.chinalake.navy.mil!vijay.chinalake.navy.mil!user
From: vijay@nawc690.chinalake.navy.mil (Jim Vijay)
Subject: Re: Ada subset -- why not?
Message-ID: <vijay-0202950813590001@vijay.chinalake.navy.mil>
Sender: usenet@avalon.chinalake.navy.mil (NAWS news admin)
Organization: NAWC
References: <vijay-0102951423400001@vijay.chinalake.navy.mil>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 13:13:59 GMT
Date: 1995-02-02T13:13:59+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Before a lot of people reply to correct me, let me do so.  By "real-time"
I mean multitasking and protected objects.  (Yes I know that is not an
exact definition.  But I don't want an net war to try and decide what
real-time means either.)  Ada lite would cantain no support for these. 
Sorry about the omission.

This message is mine - that is to say it belongs to me. (only)