From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,58253cbf46bbb1fc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!oleane.net!oleane!hunter.axlog.fr!nobody From: Jean-Pierre Rosen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Automated conversion to C++? Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:29:30 +0100 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: References: <47b9e03b$0$2787$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: mailhost.axlog.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: s1.news.oleane.net 1203406563 16034 195.25.228.57 (19 Feb 2008 07:36:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:36:03 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: <47b9e03b$0$2787$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19882 Date: 2008-02-19T08:29:30+01:00 List-Id: Peter C. Chapin a �crit : > Larry Kilgallen wrote: > It seems a little hard to believe that the standard would be worded in a > way that would prohibit a correct implementation on POSIX systems. If it > is, then that seems like a bug in the standard. > Of course, please read A.10(8). It explains that terminators may or may not be represented by control characters, and that the effect of outputing control characters is not defined by the language - i.e. they may or may not create extra terminators. -- --------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr