From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e6066104d6deadff X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-rtr.nyroc.rr.com!news-out.nyroc.rr.com!twister.nyroc.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "REH" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <1156430839.745932.279060@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: protected type interrupts X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:33:47 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.205.134.80 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1156505627 69.205.134.80 (Fri, 25 Aug 2006 07:33:47 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 07:33:47 EDT Organization: Road Runner Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6374 Date: 2006-08-25T11:33:47+00:00 List-Id: "Jean-Pierre Rosen" wrote in message news:mf6mce.8k2.ln@hunter.axlog.fr... > But since you specified a priority for the PO (and assuming > priority_ceiling), you still execute at interrupt priority. Depending on > the hardware and how priorities are managed, this may delay or hide actual > interrupts. > Are you saying it may be better not to specify a priority? REH