From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Luke A. Guest" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ironclad, the hard-Real Time capable POSIX-like kernel written in SPARK/Ada, received an nlnet grant Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 20:46:16 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 21:46:16 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7a685c8283e4fc785f6aff903e8902b7"; logging-data="1427544"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+bS3Ompo5ouBC+GKbHN0SQRGcoFS36n20=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:0gpTFpGjtr0WTMCDeo7HnH55kcc= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:66412 List-Id: On 06/10/2024 14:53, DrPi wrote: > Le 06/10/2024 à 01:10, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >> On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 18:24:39 +0200, DrPi wrote: >> >>> Le 04/10/2024 à 22:05, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>> >>>> The microkernel proponents still seem to think there is a point to >>>> their idea, even after decades of real-world experience to the >>>> contrary. >>> >>> Any evidence of this assertion ? >> >> Look around you, at what happened when people tried to use >> microkernels in >> real-world situations. I think Apple tried to use one in its “macOS” (née >> “OS X”), and performance suffered as a result. > MacOS-X is a hybrid kernel. Half way betwwen micro-kernel and monolithic > kernel. MacOS uses Mach which is well known for being a terrible implementation of the microkernel, that's why it's a hybrid, same reason NT got changed into a hybrid too.