From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!pasdenom.info!.POSTED.2a01:e0a:472:70f0:907a:9b64:eb73:7734!not-for-mail From: DrPi <314@drpi.fr> Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ironclad, the hard-Real Time capable POSIX-like kernel written in SPARK/Ada, received an nlnet grant Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 18:24:39 +0200 Organization: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 16:24:42 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: rasp.pasdenom.info; posting-account="314@usenet"; posting-host="2a01:e0a:472:70f0:907a:9b64:eb73:7734"; logging-data="5943"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@pasdenom.info" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Kg/JE9b46qmtG2OtlRCE4WR7/Us= sha256:l2+VowcwkormYTiDLDHwjroDaEIE2m38Z3cQDVm6T+A= sha1:7cRey6I7Buy8bcP9o/pjvGYrXKQ= sha256:AsmU4cK8dm7Wk4ZcKC/WxLgDpXtv/JuF58U0MS4GDbo= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:66406 List-Id: Le 04/10/2024 à 22:05, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : > On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 19:52:12 -0000 (UTC), Kevin Chadwick wrote: > >> Isn't it true that monolithic kernels become more attractive when Cs >> problens are removed with micro kernels swapping problems for new >> problems? > > The microkernel proponents still seem to think there is a point to their > idea, even after decades of real-world experience to the contrary. Any evidence of this assertion ? You should try QNX. My experience with QNX shows that it is far more stable than monolithic kernels since buggy drivers can't cause the kernel to panic. Also, you don't have to recompile the kernel each time a driver needs to be recompiled. I have many other arguments against monolithic kernels.