From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,74d953d10520ed5e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-30 12:20:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: using charles library Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 14:21:11 -0500 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <3ED2EB15.7B74D21E@somewhere.nil> <3ED6957F.9405D316@somewhere.nil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3719.2500 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38142 Date: 2003-05-30T14:21:11-05:00 List-Id: Roman V. Isaev said: >p2ada also breaks on things like this: bih:=1.e-5; So does Pastran. That's not surprising, that is not legal Pascal according to the Pascal standard. Of course, a particular compiler might allow it anyway. That's one difference between Ada and nearly every other programming language: Ada compilers are tested for conformance. An Ada compiler that tried to allow 1.e-5 would fail to pass the conformity tests and would be fixed. Other languages aren't tested, and code that doesn't work on another compiler is the result. Randy.