From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6e97963d32ee242 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-21 09:50:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!snoopy.risq.qc.ca!newsfeed.news2me.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "David C. Hoos" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The old "Object.Method" syntax debate Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 11:50:50 -0500 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <254c16a.0305210726.485125de@posting.google.com> <3ECBA778.4070909@crs4.it> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37597 Date: 2003-05-21T11:50:50-05:00 List-Id: "Jacob Sparre Andersen" wrote in message news:3ECBA778.4070909@crs4.it... > David C. Hoos wrote: > > > This was brought up in a forum regarding enhancements for Ada0X, > > at the SIG-Ada meeting last December, and the consensus was it > > should be done, so it probably will. > > Will the change mean that currently legal programs will have to be > rewritten? No, in the spirit of Ada, backward compatibility will be maintained. It will just allow an alternative syntax. > > Jacob > -- > "If you think Tuck has said something that is completely > wrong, you are almost certainly missing something :-)" > > _______________________________________________ > comp.lang.ada mailing list > comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org > http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada >