From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,558f98200681e7f6,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Steve Vestal <vestal@porcini.htc.honeywell.com>
Subject: Q: Can address clauses be restricted to static expressions?
Date: 1997/09/08
Message-ID: <vc53enfsqax.fsf@porcini.htc.honeywell.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 270802642
Organization: Honeywell Technology Center, Mpls. MN, USA.
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-09-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


When using an attribute definition clause to specify an address for an
object, does the Ada95 standard require a vendor to support run-time
calculation of the address?  Is a vendor allowed to restrict this to static
expressions?

Steve Vestal
Mail: Honeywell Technology Center, 3660 Technology Drive, Minneapolis MN 55418 
Phone: (612) 951-7049      Fax: 7438     Email: vestal_steve@htc.honeywell.com