From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada/GNAT/AWS-friendly web hosting
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 09:41:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <vc3lnf$1d9jq$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vbutl5$8a99$5@dont-email.me>
	<20240913163315.7ec71431@tag.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se>
	<vc2d66$12592$4@dont-email.me> <vc3ccc$1h339$2@dont-email.me>
	<vc3dqc$1bmhk$4@dont-email.me> <vc3ir7$1h339$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 11:41:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f0b3208cd64aa384126f587d0af4cdfe";
	logging-data="1484410"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18a195MIbbGN6ukoxSEzqMW"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nEddpFMNLr9DPRCAUKcXgmj2ONs=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:66380
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 10:51:50 +0200, Stéphane Rivière wrote:

> In the case I mentioned (PHP websites), FastCGI is a must and the
> FastCGI cache a performance grall.

OK, PHP doesn’t do WebSockets anyway, so that’s probably OK.

> But for dynamic sites (without static datas) written without PHP, I
> agree that the WebSockets protocol is indeed ideal.

WebSockets is essential for certain kinds of interactivity.

> WebSockets is a http1 only protocol.

Apparently not
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-02.html>.