From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4d972ac0c79198a5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-13 12:18:40 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "David C. Hoos" <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Generic child units
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 14:18:35 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <vc2h8egsie7me7@corp.supernews.com>
References: <3ec12f93$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> <ubry6heul.fsf@nasa.gov>
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37296
Date: 2003-05-13T14:18:35-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I think the OP meant to say 10.1.1 (18)

"Stephen Leake" <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:ubry6heul.fsf@nasa.gov...
> Rodrigo Garc�a <rodrigo.garcia.ARROBA.epfl.ch> writes:
>
> > I need some enlightment in this area... Let us suppose that I have two
> > generic packages declared in separate files and one is the parent of
> > the other:
> >
> > generic
> >     type Elem is private;
> > package Parent is
> >     type Vector is array (Integer range <>) of Elem;
> > end Parent;
> >
> > generic
> > package Parent.Child is
> >     subtype Vector2D is Vector (1 .. 2);
> > end Parent.Child;
> >
> > How can I instantiate the child package
>
> with Parent.Child;
> procedure Foo is
>    package Par is new Parent (Elem => Integer);
>    package Chi is new Par.Child;
> begin
> ...
> end Foo;
>
> Note that the second instantiation is "Par.Child", not "Parent.Child".
>
> > within the declarative region of the parent package (as required by
> > RM 10.1(18))?
>
> There is no RM 10.1 (18), at least in the copy I have (came with
> GNAT). And I don't understand the rest of the sentence, either. So I
> don't know what you mean here.
>
> -- 
> -- Stephe
> _______________________________________________
> comp.lang.ada mailing list
> comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
> http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada
>