From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "Red" And The DoD Language Competition Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:27:54 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:27:54 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fe8eaca0c36637cab02c0b5baab677cf"; logging-data="488134"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18BBoTpII/7a1ChoAlQBfnX" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SunXMS52TqW29524HrhWJvMRvxw= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:66352 List-Id: On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 23:57:33 -0500, Randy Brukardt wrote: > "Lawrence D'Oliveiro" wrote in message > news:vbimad$1j26j$6@dont-email.me... >> >> Don't you wonder why people insist on returning "403 >> Forbidden" for those using a command-line tool like wget? > > Most SEO tools and other > useless/criminal scrapers like to fake their identification, and WGet is > a favorite for that task. There are many owners that block that and many > other abused user-agents. That doesn’t make any sense, because anybody who knows how to use wget would know about its “--user-agent” option. So if they really were using wget to conduct their site abuse, you wouldn’t know, and blocking wget’s default user-agent setting wouldn’t help. > (The Ada-Auth.org blocks about 20 user-agents, but not WGet. Which kind of proves my point.