From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2609b140b6fc94c5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-25 18:38:35 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc03.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeff C," Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: compiling error X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.31.4.164 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: sccrnsc03 1064540315 66.31.4.164 (Fri, 26 Sep 2003 01:38:35 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 01:38:35 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 01:38:35 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42953 Date: 2003-09-26T01:38:35+00:00 List-Id: "Frank" wrote in message news:klJcb.32781$Hb.500256@news4.e.nsc.no... > Hi > > > Im in the WindowsXP using gnat3.15p: > > >The biggest problem I ran into is that there are features of GPS that at > >least appear to assume a gnat 5.0 series > > I havent noticed any problem regarding this. > > >...... > > the pretty printer at least appears to be poorly integrated into the tool. > > The editor does some level of indent/pretty > > printing as you go but if you have existing code you want to reformat you > > > When I choose Pretty printing it happens nothing at all. It gives a message > "gnat: unknown command: pretty" > > Grin...That is because the command option pretty (to the command gnat) is a GNAT 5.0 feature! So in fact, you have noticed a problem regarding this and just did not realize it. There are other issues (like the fact that the format of the project file (again related to pretty printing) is different. I am not saying it is totally broken without GNAT 5.0 but it certainly does not feel like a "finished" tool yet. Note that I am not really trying to put the tool down. It is not bad but it certainly looks bad when basic features appear to fail with no notice given in the website as to what to expect from the Academic version. C:\> gnat GNAT Pro 5.01a (20030721) Copyright 1996-2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. List of available commands GNAT BIND gnatbind GNAT CHOP gnatchop GNAT COMPILE gnatmake -f -u -c GNAT ELIM gnatelim GNAT FIND gnatfind GNAT KRUNCH gnatkr GNAT LINK gnatlink GNAT LIST gnatls GNAT MAKE gnatmake GNAT NAME gnatname GNAT PREPROCESS gnatprep GNAT PRETTY gnatpp GNAT STANDARD gnatpsta GNAT STUB gnatstub GNAT XREF gnatxref