From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,beb0b7471c6440e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-22 03:47:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.optus.net.au!optus!spool01.syd.optusnet.com.au!spool.optusnet.com.au!210.49.20.93.MISMATCH!not-for-mail From: IsraelRT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 'Cyclone', a safer C--reinventing the wheel Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 22:46:02 +1100 Message-ID: References: <3BFA4095.8325D016@earthlink.net> <3BFA8AE3.48AE4F21@sparc01.ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.164.144.6 X-Trace: 1006429564 10228 203.164.144.6 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16851 Date: 2001-11-22T22:46:02+11:00 List-Id: On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 11:54:59 -0500, Wes Groleau wrote: >2. The particular post you complained about was not an > "Ada is better" post. It was expressing disbelief > that someone is touting improvements on C as something > special when they have been proven in Ada and other > languages for over 20 years. Actually the post was by an ignorant and intelelctually lazy idiot who had not bothered to find out for himself just what Cyclone consists of http://www.cs.cornell.edu/talc/overview.html