From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fc52c633190162e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny07.POSTED!0e8a908a!not-for-mail From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: why learn C? References: <1172144043.746296.44680@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1172161751.573558.24140@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <546qkhF1tr7dtU1@mid.individual.net> <5ZULh.48$YL5.40@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net> <1175215906.645110.217810@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1175230352.808212.15550@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1175236212.771445.135460@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1175308871.266257.77460@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1175499821.557815.303270@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1175511246.9702.24.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:21:47 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.84.194.64 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trndny07 1176481307 162.84.194.64 (Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:21:47 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:21:47 EDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14984 Date: 2007-04-13T16:21:47+00:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: > But I don't see any way in which that would prevent > me from designing an Ada-like language with implicit instantiation. Yes, I think you're right. I'm thinking of what can be done with C++ template metaprogramming. That requires specialization and the ability to distinguish between types based on their names and template parameters, and I don't know if that can be fitted into the context of Ada where subtypes and generic instantiations depend upon local context. > If I remember, the C++ rules include preference rules, though. Is that > correct? Preference rules can cause Beaujolais effects, which in my > opinion are very bad. Yes, preference rules abound. They're applied one parameter at a time, though, which helps limit the confusion.