From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101deb,6be11e765df1680d X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,6be11e765df1680d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-23 09:58:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "GerardS" Newsgroups: comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: PL/I is a viable language Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:58:58 -0600 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.pl1:4438 comp.lang.ada:34480 Date: 2003-02-23T11:58:58-06:00 List-Id: | Glen Herrmannsfeldt wrote: || robin wrote: | (snip regarding the ability to find errors in programs) |> PL/I tells you where the needle actually is. | On the 360/91 it told you where the error was near. PL/I had an option (for the 360/91) to identify the correct PL/I statement. One method was to put an extra semicolon at the end of each statement (or those statements that were likely to cause an error). _______________________________________________Gerard S.