From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,103b407e8b68350b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-06 12:11:40 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Anybody in US using ADA ? Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:06:06 -0600 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <3e18f3f6_1@news.tm.net.my> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3719.2500 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32637 Date: 2003-01-06T14:06:06-06:00 List-Id: Adrian Hoe wrote in message <3e18f3f6_1@news.tm.net.my>... >If there were Turbo Ada in the mid/late 80's, Ada could have been a >mainstream programming language today. If there were M$ Visual Ada, Of course there *was* a Turbo-like Ada in the mid 80's. Indeed, there were several companies vying for that market. The basic Janus/Ada system cost $99 then; it was validated in 1987, but versions were available before that. Indeed, we still have that compiler (Janus/Ada 83 for MS-DOS) available for $129. Perhaps the product could have been better or the marketing better, but certainly low-cost Ada compilers existed from the mid 80's onwards. Randy Brukardt.