From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f948976d12c7ee33
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-29 14:39:40 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny02.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030611 Thunderbird/0.1a
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Boeing and Dreamliner
References: <mailman.4.1056169754.352.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <zN9Ja.2184$N%6.569@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> <3EFC6FC2.B96DAEA4@adaworks.com>
 <1056731513.272294@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <e2e5731a.0306271633.20140ba6@posting.google.com>
 <k2wLa.21663$N%6.3746@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
 <e2e5731a.0306290856.4990acaf@posting.google.com>
 <RTHLa.23921$N%6.8888@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
 <O06WkEY4SjOG@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <uJILa.24085$N%6.15479@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
 <hEE+2H5rHMDQ@eisner.encompasserve.org>
In-Reply-To: <hEE+2H5rHMDQ@eisner.encompasserve.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <v0JLa.24175$N%6.5659@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:39:39 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.84.196.85
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: nwrdny02.gnilink.net 1056922779 162.84.196.85 (Sun,
 29 Jun 2003 17:39:39 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:39:39 EDT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39911
Date: 2003-06-29T21:39:39+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Larry Kilgallen wrote:
> Assuming there is no context for a piece of software is fatuous.

In a project as thoroughly specified, documented, and tested as this,
assuming that important limitations would be mentioned is not fatuous,
just unfortunate.