From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,958ed45cc4906b53
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-30 01:01:35 PST
Path:
archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!opentransit.net!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Distributed system portability
Date: 30 Jul 2001 10:00:45 +0200
Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
Message-ID:
References: <3B644557.C599A03C@san.rr.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mix-boulogne-105-1-65.abo.wanadoo.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 996480094 22127 193.250.57.65 (30 Jul 2001 08:01:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Jul 2001 08:01:34 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.104
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10716
Date: 2001-07-30T08:01:34+00:00
List-Id:
Darren New writes:
> Is it generally the case that a distributed system compiled on two
> different architectures can talk to itself? In other words, if I write a
> distributed system with GNAT, and I compile one portion on Windows and
> another portion on Linux, are these two systems likely to talk to each
> other?
No problem with GLADE the GNAT implementation of the distributed Annex. And
this is not theory I've done it :)
Pascal.
--
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"