From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,236576d8947fc908 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: users of GNADE MySQL binding? References: <7h2qmsF2r353sU1@mid.individual.net> From: Stephen Leake Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:54:51 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9hmdJJfwySOOLx7oBosgCZMe4Xg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com X-Trace: db6c84aaccf2de197caa702895 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8310 Date: 2009-09-13T06:54:51-04:00 List-Id: Bj�rn Persson writes: > Stephen Leake wrote: > >> I'm considering becomming the Debian maintainer of GNADE. >> >> In going over the code while preparing a release, I realized that the >> C structs that had been duplicated in Ada records in the GNADE MySQL >> binding are now wrong; they have changed significantly with each MySQL >> release, and GNADE has not kept up. >> >> Therefore the MySQL binding in GNADE 1.5.3 (currently in Debian Lenny) >> most likely doesn't work, so I'm thinking no one uses it. > > Uh-oh! I'm glad I decided to access MySQL through ODBC. > >> Rather than fixing it now, I'm considering dropping that library from >> the Debian release. I'll still package the ODBC binding, which does >> work with MySQL. >> >> Any objections? Comments? > > No objection from me, as I'm only using the ODBC binding. Ok. > Have you seen my patch to the size comparisons in the generic versions of > SQLBindCol and SQLBindParameter? Yes, it's in my current sources. -- -- Stephe