From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,791530e499e6a7f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ray Blaak Subject: Re: ada writing guide Date: 2000/04/13 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 610844354 Sender: blaak@LANGLEY References: <8d1rso$bir$2@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au> <8d1vhj$hdr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8d2hig$7e6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38F5DF8C.1A01E5A4@utech.net> <8d4t07$o15$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Complaints-To: news@bctel.net X-Trace: news.bc.tac.net 955661210 209.53.149.68 (Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:26:50 PDT) Organization: The Transcend NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:26:50 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison writes: > > procedure Foo( > > D : in out Data; > > C : in Data); > > I don't mind this so much. But there is a small problem with it. Emacs > Ada mode (at least my version of it), will try to line up the parameters > with the open paren, so unless you want to fight Emacs your whole life > to put it back, you end up with: > > procedure Foo( > D : in out Data; > C : in Data); Well, if you do this: procedure Foo (D : in out Data; C : in Data); then things look better IMHO, and you don't have to fight Emacs at all. -- Cheers, The Rhythm is around me, The Rhythm has control. Ray Blaak The Rhythm is inside me, blaak@infomatch.com The Rhythm has my soul.