From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,92c39a3be0a7f17d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-20 12:37:34 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Portable GUI (was Re: Future with Ada) Date: 20 Dec 2001 15:28:45 -0500 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Message-ID: References: <9v57u1$mfb$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9v74ov014bc@drn.newsguy.com> <9vb24v$7fg$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9vdo2a$9h3$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3C20C5CE.DBFE5B96@san.rr.com> <9vqk0f$cp9$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3C223DE4.9A50C1B2@adaworks.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1008880335 12587 128.183.220.71 (20 Dec 2001 20:32:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: dscoggin@cne-odin.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Dec 2001 20:32:15 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18170 Date: 2001-12-20T20:32:15+00:00 List-Id: Richard Riehle writes: > > > The conclusion: Ada is attractive, as a language. It is not attractive > when one examines the associated development tools and libraries. We > have a long way to go. What sort of application did they do? If it's a GUI system, this makes perfect sense. For an embedded real time system, I'd be more surprised. And what exactly were the development environments used? (for all the languages). Is there any sort of published/web accessible description of this? -- -- Stephe