From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,53c5fea49e77990c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-02 08:31:45 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!deine.net!freenix!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Dot Net ?
Date: 02 Apr 2002 18:31:40 +0200
Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
Message-ID: <uwuvq12qb.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
References: <gvSo8.10$X76.855@paloalto-snr2.gtei.net>
 <3CA48637.C5C4DEF5@despammed.com> <3ca487fd$1@news.cadence.com>
 <u3cyjfbn9.fsf@wanadoo.fr> <62340e2a.0204011257.4679edb4@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: avelizy-103-1-5-14.abo.wanadoo.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 1017765104 22148 80.13.115.14 (2 Apr 2002 16:31:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Apr 2002 16:31:44 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22000
Date: 2002-04-02T16:31:44+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


gmc444@yahoo.com (Greg C) writes:

> Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message news:<u3cyjfbn9.fsf@wanadoo.fr>...
> > Jean-Marc Bourguet <jm@bourguet.org> writes:
> > 
> > > Wes Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com> writes:
> > > 
> > > > Ada on .Net would be a Good Thing, but if it
> > > > would remain truly Ada, it would be a Better Thing.
> > > 
> > > I seem to remember that Eiffel changed its definition to better fit
> > > the model of .NET.
> > 
> > Well they do not have changed Eiffel definition, but they have created an
> > Eiffel .NET language. For example on .NET there is no multiple inheritance...
> 
> Not true. The Beta version had some restrictions, but no MI was not
> one of them. There are limitations on using MI when integrating Eiffel
> components with other languages, but that's really because of
> limitations in the other languages.

Oh, well I'm sure I have read that somewhere... I should have checked myself.
Sorry for the misinformation.

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|         http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"