From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-26 12:54:48 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail
From: Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Grace and Maps (was Re: Development process in the Ada community)
Date: 26 Apr 2002 12:31:15 -0400
Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov)
Message-ID: <uwuuu1kx8.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de> <3CBAFFEE.2080708@snafu.de>
 <4519e058.0204171036.6f0a7394@posting.google.com> <3CBDD795.4060706@snafu.de>
 <4519e058.0204180800.44fac012@posting.google.com> <3CBF0341.8020406@mail.com>
 <a9n0tk$6fs$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <4519e058.0204190529.559a47ae@posting.google.com>
 <a9p98h$8hn$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3CC1C6B3.6060306@telepath.com>
 <3CC21747.5000501@telepath.com> <3CC59ED2.1000803@home.com>
 <uadrunsuq.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> <3CC5B286.6FE61551@san.rr.com>
 <uznzumd1p.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> <3CC5B9EE.32F3060@san.rr.com>
 <uhem1m47l.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> <aa6ots$hpn$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <3CC83282.69C1884F@san.rr.com> <aa9cvv$pbj$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1019839072 10672 128.183.220.71 (26 Apr 2002
 16:37:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Apr 2002 16:37:51 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23151
Date: 2002-04-26T16:37:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Marin David Condic" <dont.bother.mcondic.auntie.spam@[acm.org> writes:

> 3) Speaking of files, couldn't Ada benefit from having a "Standard" RDBMS?
> There used to be AdaSage, but I don't think it was a generic DBMS thing. I
> don't even know if it gets much use these days or if it is being actively
> maintained. Is there something that could be declared "The Conventional Ada
> Answer" for an RDBMS?

http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnade/

This is a "standard" interface to databases, both via ODBC, and direct
to a few open source dbms. I don't see any need to reimplement a dbms
in Ada.

-- 
-- Stephe