From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6148e77d4edcfadd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-24 06:38:37 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: freeing general access types Date: 24 Dec 2002 09:36:10 -0500 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1040741296 29704 128.183.235.92 (24 Dec 2002 14:48:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Dec 2002 14:48:16 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32283 Date: 2002-12-24T14:48:16+00:00 List-Id: tmoran@acm.org writes: > If P is a general access type, is there any way to know whether it's > pointing to allocated storage, and should have Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation > applied to avoid a memory leak, or it's pointing at a declared > object, which should not be deallocated? I don't think so. I use naming conventions and distinct types for that; one access type either _always_ points to constants, or _always_ should be deallocated. Or you can store info inside the type that gives this information. -- -- Stephe