From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aea4cc77526f5e4a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps89.POSTED!023a3d7c!not-for-mail
Sender: blaak@METROID
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
References: <FJDvj.10151$0o7.9092@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>
 <wccr6f4y94q.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <7xJvj.7420$Ru4.4246@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net>
 <wcc63wfpus7.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <j6Yvj.2585$fX7.895@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com>
 <wccbq679zah.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <c39wj.4638$Mh2.4179@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>
 <wccve4eff0d.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <1wkwj.10399$0o7.2971@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>
 <wccmyppg7yd.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <TdPwj.12744$Ch6.10636@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net>
 <uhcfv5xql.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net>
 <Ps3xj.8089$xq2.4717@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net>
 <u1w6y87fd.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net> <wccfxverpyo.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: Ray Blaak <rAYblaaK@STRIPCAPStelus.net>
Message-ID: <uwsoq6khn.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net>
Organization: The Transcend
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:35:35 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.66.252.228
X-Trace: edtnps89 1204155335 208.66.252.228 (Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:35:35 MST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:35:35 MST
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20134
Date: 2008-02-27T23:35:35+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> writes:
> > GNAT's library model lives on a different place on the tradeoff curve as
> > compared to the other Ada vendors. It allows some problems to be avoided at
> > the expense of suffering from other possible problems that the other Ada
> > vendors do not.
> 
> What's the "suffering" you see here?

None myself. I am speaking theoretically. There must be *some* advantage to the
library approaches the other vendors use, right? Right? :-)

-- 
Cheers,                                        The Rhythm is around me,
                                               The Rhythm has control.
Ray Blaak                                      The Rhythm is inside me,
rAYblaaK@STRIPCAPStelus.net                    The Rhythm has my soul.