From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,df1a7f1c3c3bc77e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: An Ada Advice Inquiry References: <463B7BBF.4080603@obry.net> <65gsg4-9si.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com> From: Markus E Leypold Organization: N/A Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 22:55:46 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:l+t/t2zC1F9RlSZEAzIA5Tiu/Jw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.233.39 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1178311649 88.72.233.39 (4 May 2007 22:47:29 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!out04b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in03.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!bigfeed3.bellsouth.net!news.bellsouth.net!news-in.ntli.net!newsrout1-win.ntli.net!ntli.net!news.highwinds-media.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15557 Date: 2007-05-04T22:55:46+02:00 List-Id: Jeffrey Creem writes: > Michael Bode wrote: >> Pascal Obry writes: >> >>> Frankly I 100% agree with Stephen. Ada gives a big advantage against the >>> concurrence, why not use it just for that. An better question to me >>> whould be : who is providing compilers, tools and support for Ada? Looks >>> like the Ada market is fine to me. >> Wanted: affordable cross platform (i.e. Windows + Linux) Ada >> development system. No licensing restrictions for software produced >> with said development system. >> My company will start selling diode lasers with a new touch panel HMI >> that was programmed in Ada later this year. It was fun to work on this >> project, but I have to use fairly old versions of the compiler & libs >> because newer ones are either too expensive or not viable because of >> licensing restrictions. >> > Last time I checked it certainly did not seem like the Aonix tools > were particularly expensive in small quantities. Last time I checked they were to expensive to develop an embedded appliance with them (in small quantities) and then keep the compiler around for 10 years for maintainance (which every sane customer will reuqire). AFAIR they still have that minimum 5 seat clause (a bit much for the 9 years of maintainance). Regards -- Markus