From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1054df2e2c490eda
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Hannes Haug <Hannes.Haug@Student.Uni-Tuebingen.de>
Subject: Re: Q: Memory management
Date: 1996/06/25
Message-ID: <uvvg27kjm35.fsf@chaq.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 162013564
sender: haugha@chaq.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
references: <9606241936.AA11042@most>
organization: Uni Tuebingen
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-06-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>>>>> "Wes" == "W Wesley Groleau (Wes)" <wwgrol@PSESERV3.FW.HAC.COM> writes:

    Wes> Hannes suggests
    >> Pass_To_Assembler ( X ( X.all'First )'Address );

    Wes> X.all'First and X'First should be identical.

    Wes> X'Address and X(X'First)'Address should be identical, too,
    Wes> unless ...

Is this true if you deal with unconstrained arrays ? The bounds have
to be stored at the beginning of the array. I think that X'Address
would give you the address of the location where the bounds are stored.

 -hannes