From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,154942e4f1d1b8e9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net.POSTED!14bb18d8!not-for-mail Sender: Matthew Heaney@MHEANEYIBMT43 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Dynamically tagged expression required References: <2852224.m2vuDFxfOX@linux1.krischik.com> <3818406.kEZhMvudHC@linux1.krischik.com> <3610380.mzgl1UEuzs@linux1.krischik.com> From: Matthew Heaney Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:07:20 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.149.57.125 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net 1134324440 24.149.57.125 (Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:07:20 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:07:20 PST Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6831 Date: 2005-12-11T18:07:20+00:00 List-Id: Martin Krischik writes: > This is of corse true. It is just that my first container library was IBM > Open-Class-Library. The OCL is a far higher level container library when > compared to the STL. And as such I prefer the Booch-Components over the > Ada.Containers. Why do you say that the OCL is a "higher-level library" than the STL or the Ada standard library? In the STL you say: map_t m; //... m[k] = e; m.erase(k); and in Ada you say: M : Map; begin --... M.Include (K, E); M.Exclude (K); How much more high-level can a library be? Considering your description of the OCL (given in another post), did you really mean that it's more low-level?