From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-26 16:06:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 18:06:04 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 18:06:23 -0500 From: Wesley Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: the Ada mandate, and why it collapsed and died (was): 64 bit addressing and OOP References: <3EA04A1E.CAFC1FEF@adaworks.com> <9fa75d42.0304221126.7112b7d5@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0304230439.55d28e70@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0304240503.54dbc5d1@posting.google.com> <20619edc.0304240953.221ac70f@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0304250448.5107afef@posting.google.com> <20619edc.0304252116.621a4bf4@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0304260649.366530c5@posting.google.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.71 X-Trace: sv3-WBuJukbohSND1S+hnVZqVTy7KmUqS1i2ddAHEO+sHeD/pKbgBuWagewhPQnK24h3AIAYrh9UDmgsunB!Ph2/DMxPMdYS5l1xCiu/jam3Qcz+ywmGyJeE+ffI931Se5LaExIqSsk85jEih8CZsj9ycKXbBOns!RsT6 X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:62725 comp.object:62091 comp.lang.ada:36620 Date: 2003-04-26T18:06:23-05:00 List-Id: >>NOBODY except computer programmers complain about reliability >>of Windows. They might claim it's frustrating, but not >>unreliable. > > Really? How about some truck drivers who have > to be put on hold while the Windoze system > reboots, reloads, gets up to snuff and finally > prints that piece of paper that would have > taken about 20 seconds to write by hand? > Or the poor despatcher who wouldn't know > Windoze from bit-bucket except that he/she > needs to reboot it every half-hour or so just > to get rid of the frozen parts of it and get the > trucks moving. You people are talking about two different things. There are TWO operating systems called Windows. Windows 3.1 / 95 / 98 / ME crashes daily for many users Windows NT / 2000 / XP is a completely different O.S. It still crashes, but it is reliable enough for most people.