From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b28570cbd7888b08,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-10 10:30:59 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: access to subprogram via constant object Date: 10 Sep 2002 13:31:01 -0400 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1031679651 20546 128.183.220.71 (10 Sep 2002 17:40:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Sep 2002 17:40:51 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28805 Date: 2002-09-10T17:40:51+00:00 List-Id: There was a discussion here a while ago (I think it was this summer, but maybe earlier) about accessing a subprogram thru a pointer object. There was some reason why all clients should always access the subprogram thru the same pointer. I find myself doing something similar (with OpenToken), so I'd like to remember what the issue was, to see if it matters here. Anyone remember? I tried to find this with Google, but it doesn't have a fuzzy enough search algorithm :). I need some human brains. -- -- Stephe