From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,50137bb64a119cfc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-20 09:37:44 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "access constant" discriminant Date: 20 Feb 2003 12:34:13 -0500 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: <_TO1a.14664$9y2.6601@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <3CS1a.55972$2H6.1357@sccrnsc04> <3E4E9248.3E71D984@adaworks.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1045763229 10050 128.183.235.92 (20 Feb 2003 17:47:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Feb 2003 17:47:09 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34286 Date: 2003-02-20T17:47:09+00:00 List-Id: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) writes: > Why is it necessary to have the parameter be an access type ? (as opposed to "in", I assume) Because the body needs to call other functions that take access types (that may beg the question, but it's the best I can do :). -- -- Stephe