From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1983ae2deb642ab
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-25 10:02:15 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!freenix!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada -vs- GNAT
Date: 25 May 2002 19:02:09 +0200
Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
Message-ID: <usn4g88ku.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
References: <sXCH8.103053$Po6.225647@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net>
 <UwHH8.1309$Uk6.141589@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com>
 <5ee5b646.0205250737.4ec74872@posting.google.com>
 <BsOH8.1754$t8.377092@news11-gui.server.ntli.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: avelizy-103-1-2-208.abo.wanadoo.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 1022346135 8867 217.128.15.208 (25 May 2002 17:02:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 May 2002 17:02:15 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24775
Date: 2002-05-25T17:02:15+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com> writes:

> "Robert Dewar" <dewar@gnat.com> wrote in message
> news:5ee5b646.0205250737.4ec74872@posting.google.com...
> > "chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:<UwHH8.1309$Uk6.141589@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com>.
> >
> > > To me it's just clutter, but what do I know?
> >
> > What are you saying is clutter here? Using either pragma
> > in this case?
> 
> No, having two pragmas that do the same thing is what IMO is clutter (when
> just one will do, and there's one already present).  Perhaps I should say
> what I mean by clutter, I mean it's more or less another name for the same
> thing, so it could be uneccessary.  It may make it easier to read, but it's
> just a short hand for something.

That's wrong ! There is no short hand here. Read my previous post.

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|         http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595