From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,80b3e504140e89fd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-24 06:13:08 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Config_Files proposal Date: 24 Jun 2002 09:09:57 -0400 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: <4519e058.0206190708.2ef205e4@posting.google.com> <3D10AF1F.3000805@attbi.com> <3D10B728.BD5E08C3@san.rr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1024924636 604 128.183.220.71 (24 Jun 2002 13:17:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Jun 2002 13:17:16 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26644 Date: 2002-06-24T13:17:16+00:00 List-Id: "Marin David Condic" writes: > Well, if, for example, the decisions for the API lead to some kind of > complex tree-like structure, you might have a really hard time storing this > in some simpler file format like .CSV or as simple attribute/value pairs. But that would violate the requirement that the API _must_ be independent of the file format, and would therefore be a bad API decision. > I suggested elsewhere that establishing a package spec now and > leaving the file format for later would be a wise thing. It starts > some progress and helps clarify the problems. If I generalize this to "make some decisions now", choosing the file format now is also wise :). > Assumimg that the API is going to have something pretty basic like > "Load/Store" operations with a file name and a data structure, you > really don't have to settle the file format issues until later & it > creates the possibility of trying out many different ones. Since we need to settle on one file format, and we've had about a month of discussion on it, what more needs to be done to pick a file format? -- -- Stephe