From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,332634d2cbb2798c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-25 17:25:42 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Sender: mheaney@MHEANEYX200 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: who is in charge of Ada 0Y? References: <87f5a614.0309251319.f66444c@posting.google.com> From: Matthew Heaney Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:25:41 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.110.133.134 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net 1064535941 65.110.133.134 (Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:25:41 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:25:41 EDT Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42950 Date: 2003-09-26T00:25:41+00:00 List-Id: svaa@ciberpiula.net (svaa) writes: > As far as I've read, there is no organization planning changes for Ada > 0Y. In such case, Ada95 is as petrified as Latin, and so it's doomed. > Have I missed something? is there such organization? I don't know whether Ada95 is as petrified as Latin, but the language is actively being maintained under the stewardship of the ARG (Ada Rapporteur Group). In fact I just submitted a proposal for a standard container library for Ada 0X to the ARG this very afternoon!