From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,699cc914522aa7c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps82.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Sender: blaak@METROID Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Structured exception information References: From: Ray Blaak Organization: The Transcend Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:20:05 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 154.20.94.243 X-Trace: edtnps82 1169328005 154.20.94.243 (Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:20:05 MST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:20:05 MST Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8374 Date: 2007-01-20T21:20:05+00:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake writes: > Robert A Duff writes: > > By now, several cases have been presented. Are you convinced? > > Well, none were very detailed. What about mine (with the user vs "internal" detail strings)? That forces a parsing problem, which is a pain, and potentially more buggy. The point that Ada could improve in this area to be more convenient to the programmer. > > Please be more specific. > > Well, I can't. I plead guilty to arguing from authority and vague > memory on this one. The memory is of discussions of problems with > various exception implementations in C++ and Java, on other > newsgroups. These days, exceptions work well in other languages, especially in the controlled languages like C# and Java. "Buggy exceptions" are no longer an issue in practice. There is no reason for Ada to be behind in this area. -- Cheers, The Rhythm is around me, The Rhythm has control. Ray Blaak The Rhythm is inside me, rAYblaaK@STRIPCAPStelus.net The Rhythm has my soul.