From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9506bdc34331969a X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: put of access type References: <4a8ce6a0$1@news.post.ch> From: Stephen Leake Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:02:00 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5CCvyP4hewKqO9V47W9Tx7LCsr8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com X-Trace: 232c54a8fde20e197caa713184 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7964 Date: 2009-08-22T08:02:00-04:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff writes: > Stephen Leake writes: > >> The same goes for access types for unconstrained arrays; they just >> don't make sense if you don't know about the dope. > > Well, you have to know that unconstrained arrays have bounds. > That's not specific to access types -- the same is true > for parameters and so forth. Do you need to know > how the bounds are stored for a parameter of type String > in order to understand such parameters? Not in detail, but you do have to know that they are somehow passed along with the string contents. -- -- Stephe