From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a072745e2e39f048,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-09 06:11:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!dedd8.d.pppool.DE!not-for-mail From: Stefan Soos Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Different initial values for derived type? Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 15:10:06 +0100 Message-ID: Reply-To: stefan.soos@gmx.de NNTP-Posting-Host: dedd8.d.pppool.de (80.184.237.216) X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1068387072 45423592 80.184.237.216 (16 [16707]) X-Orig-Path: ID-soos.user.dfncis.de!nobody User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2280 Date: 2003-11-09T15:10:06+01:00 List-Id: Hello, I've got the following type definition type Object_Type is tagged record Name : Character := '?'; Score : Natural := 0; X : Positive := 1; Y : Positive := 1; end record; Now I'd like to have a derived type with the same components but with different initial Values. Do I have to use discriminants for all of my components or can I say something like type Derived_Type is new Object_Type with ( Name => '!', Score => 10); I know, I can't because it doesn't compile, but is there a similar approach? Thanks in advance, Stefan --