From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,63a41ccea0fc803a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: taashlo@sandia.SPAMFREE.gov
Subject: Naming of Tagged Types and Associated Packages
Date: 1998/07/16
Message-ID: <ur9zlv6tx.fsf@sandia.SPAMFREE.gov>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 372153533
Organization: Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM USA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-07-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In the _Ada 95 Quality and Style_ guidelines, section 3.2.4 "Naming of
Tagged Types and Associated Packages", there are two instantions.  One
integrates the use of object-oriented features.  The other highlights
the use of object-oriented features.  Could somebody please give a 
summary of the strengths and weaknesses of each?  And maybe an example
of where one convention would be more appropriate than the other?

Thanks,

Tad Ashlock <taashlo@sandia.gov>