From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d7ec12dd7db366 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-30 02:05:17 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!npeer.kpnqwest.net!news.edf.fr!not-for-mail From: Pascal Obry Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to rename a file? Date: 30 Sep 2001 10:53:16 +0200 Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry Sender: obry@PASCAL Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.107.131.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: clnews.edf.fr 1001840089 9363 163.107.131.27 (30 Sep 2001 08:54:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsadm@news.edf.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Sep 2001 08:54:49 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.106 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13540 Date: 2001-09-30T08:54:49+00:00 List-Id: "David Botton" writes: > That's not cool, but certainly an alternative. ;) > The coolness is in that code was that you don't need any "special" bindings > for accessing low level C calls. In fact I think far to much emphasis has > been placed on the need of thin bindings. Concentration should rather be David, really POSIX is *far* from being a thin binding. Your cool example is way more thin than mine :) << function Rename_File2 (Old_File, New_File : String) return Boolean is function MoveFile (Old_Name : String := Old_File & Character'Val (0); New_Name : String := New_File & Character'Val (0)) return Boolean; pragma Import (StdCall, MoveFile, "MoveFileA"); begin return MoveFile; end Rename_File2; >> Character'Val (0), Stdcall, pragma Import... > made on "frameworks" (which POSIX bindings may perhaps also be included, as > cross platform was in mind) and tools that abstract the C interfaces and > work in a more Ada like nature. I won't call POSIX a framework since it is a _binding_ but yet not a thin one. And yes in cross-platform environemnt it is definitly the choice, this is why I do use it! Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry --| --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"