From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,75dc140d36278665 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-04 09:16:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.bc.tac.net!news.bc.tac.net!not-for-mail Sender: blaak@TORUS Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Calling Java Methods from Ada References: <3C8039A6.6050707@none.com> From: Ray Blaak Message-ID: Organization: The Transcend X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Date: 04 Mar 2002 09:13:53 -0800 NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.181.209.61 X-Complaints-To: news@bctel.net X-Trace: news.bc.tac.net 1015262206 208.181.209.61 (Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:16:46 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:16:46 PST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20776 Date: 2002-03-04T09:13:53-08:00 List-Id: Ray Blaak writes: > The Alchemist writes: > > Or do you think we will need to go with an intermediary technology like > > CORBA or SOAP? > > These would be far too heavyweight, given that they are designed for > interprocess communications across wide area networks. Note also, that CORBA/SOAP solutions would suffer from the same problem as the JNI solution with the required JNI env parameter: they would also need some sort of server "address" that describes where to send the message to. If you can set that up, then you can also set up the JNI env value. -- Cheers, The Rhythm is around me, The Rhythm has control. Ray Blaak The Rhythm is inside me, blaak@telus.net The Rhythm has my soul.