From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,447840d42a580dc0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-25 14:35:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: child packages and nested packages Date: 25 Mar 2002 17:31:43 -0500 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: <6a6390b8.0203230702.14c071c1@posting.google.com> <4519e058.0203250701.7819a546@posting.google.com> <6a6390b8.0203251126.8eebc37@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1017095835 24446 128.183.220.71 (25 Mar 2002 22:37:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Mar 2002 22:37:15 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21658 Date: 2002-03-25T22:37:15+00:00 List-Id: okellogg@freenet.de (Oliver Kellogg) writes: > dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison) wrote: > > > > Try declaring Pkg.Nested.Child within Pkg. > > Well, my point was not wanting to do that. > Imagine Pkg to be the production of a code generator, potentially > containing hundreds of these nested packages, while Pkg.Nested.Child > is a human written extension. I hope you can influence the automatic tool to produce code that lets you do what you need to do :). This is the base of automatic tools; they always need tweeking, and some don't allow the user sufficient power to do the tweeking. You might consider using separate subunits, declared in the body of Pkg. But you probably need tool support for that as well. -- -- Stephe