From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,84be9c5a380874d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-10 15:34:32 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail
From: Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: gprof with gnat
Date: 10 May 2002 18:20:10 -0400
Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov)
Message-ID: <ur8kj1w85.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
References: <3CCD2328.C5722FC3@epfl.ch> <aanpmm$9td$1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>
 <3CCF8702.A7537851@epfl.ch> <5ee5b646.0205010433.6fc30656@posting.google.com>
 <3CD0E169.88A260A0@epfl.ch> <5ee5b646.0205020353.650900e5@posting.google.com>
 <3CD237A7.B91E6F32@epfl.ch> <3cd2816f$1@news.cadence.com>
 <db6d897a.0205051240.193c7e6a@posting.google.com>
 <ur8kp8isu.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> <abecfs$lcm$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1021069592 12622 128.183.220.71 (10 May 2002
 22:26:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 May 2002 22:26:32 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23873
Date: 2002-05-10T22:26:32+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Marin David Condic" <dont.bother.mcondic.auntie.spam@[acm.org> writes:

> Everybody's tastes vary. For me, I've usually seen the original post and
> want to get immediately to the reply. Scanning down through nested layers of
> earlier posts to get to an "I Agree!" response is not what I want to do.

Agreed. That's precisely when snipping is in order :).

> Hence I post on top - and have had some people jump on my case about
> it as if it were a mortal sin. :-)

Not quite "mortal", but up there :).

> My attitude is that the moment someone purchases the newsgroup and
> has full and clear title to it, they can post whatever rules they
> like for people to participate in it. In the mean time they can
> possibly take some "toleration lessons" and I'll be their homework.
> :-)

Good point.

-- 
-- Stephe