From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f51e93dacd9c7fca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-14 09:33:35 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: status of Ada STL? Date: 14 Jun 2002 12:29:52 -0400 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1024072665 19225 128.183.220.71 (14 Jun 2002 16:37:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jun 2002 16:37:45 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25954 Date: 2002-06-14T16:37:45+00:00 List-Id: 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ) writes: > I am trying to determine the status of the Ada version of the C++ > Standard Template Library. I see that this has been discussed in the > past on comp.lang.ada, but I don't see much on it in the past year or > so. Is it still in the works somewhere? How far along is it compared > to the C++ STL? And does Ada have any fundamental limitations that > preclude the full functionality of the C++ version? Thanks. As I recall, there is no one "Ada version of the STL"; there are instead several. One is the Booch components, one is my SAL, there are others. See http://www.adapower.com/ | Source Code | Source Code Packages for reuse | scroll down to "component libraries". (Hmm, mine isn't there!). Hmm, I guess Grace could evolve into "the one", but that's not currently it's stated goal. -- -- Stephe