From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8de7eedad50552f1,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!proxad.net!193.252.118.146.MISMATCH!news.wanadoo.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail Sender: obry@PASCAL Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Ada bench From: Pascal Obry Date: 19 Mar 2005 17:22:23 +0100 Message-ID: Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Mar 2005 17:22:25 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.120.29.102 X-Trace: 1111249345 news.wanadoo.fr 817 82.120.29.102:4599 X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9619 Date: 2005-03-19T17:22:25+01:00 List-Id: I don't want to restart this thread. I just want to point out that the famous matrix bench from Shootout that has been talked out here is now running a bit faster with GNU/Ada than GNU/C and GNU/C++. I have contributed a new version. The 4 time slower was because the Ada program was poorly written and the Ada options passed to the compiler were not the same used for GNU/C and GNU/C++. This is a proof for nothing except maybe that GNU/Ada is not inherently slow. For what it's worth... Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://www.obry.org --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595