From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,699cc914522aa7c4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!bigfeed3.bellsouth.net!news.bellsouth.net!uns-out.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Structured exception information
References: <eog0g5$2bn$1@cernne03.cern.ch> <u7ivnp09z.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
  <eoinoh$855$1@cernne03.cern.ch> <ud55drgzz.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
  <eolaen$b4h$1@cernne03.cern.ch> <ur6trwdov.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
  <wccd55alqzu.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <u1wlpy8q7.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
  <usle5s8e3.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net>
From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:34:05 -0500
Message-ID: <ur6to9fhe.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:q38LWDBP1S/EDY259OqO8bYNrEE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com
Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com
X-Trace: 4447345b3ea62759e00d429968
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8384
Date: 2007-01-21T17:34:05-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ray Blaak <rAYblaaK@STRIPCAPStelus.net> writes:

> Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> writes:
>> Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> writes:
>> > By now, several cases have been presented.  Are you convinced?
>> 
>> Well, none were very detailed. 
>
> What about mine (with the user vs "internal" detail strings)?

Yes, sorry, that was well presented, and convincing.

>> Well, I can't. I plead guilty to arguing from authority and vague
>> memory on this one. The memory is of discussions of problems with
>> various exception implementations in C++ and Java, on other
>> newsgroups. 
>
> These days, exceptions work well in other languages, especially in the
> controlled languages like C# and Java.
>
> "Buggy exceptions" are no longer an issue in practice.
>
> There is no reason for Ada to be behind in this area.

Ok, I'll accept that.

-- 
-- Stephe