From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,91829d2306080fa8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-09 09:54:57 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Matthew Heaney" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Newbie question on child packages Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:54:55 -0400 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29626 Date: 2002-10-09T12:54:55-04:00 List-Id: "Justin Birtwell" wrote in message news:TGYo9.41836$Mw4.34226@nwrddc01.gnilink.net... > Thanks, It worked! does the pragma Pure allow me to not specifically > prefix all the child packages with 'jb'? No. It's there because of package elaboration issues. In general, you should mark the "categorization" of packages, using the strongest categorization possible: pragma Pure; pragma Preelaborate; pragma Elaborate_Body;